Another day, and another reason why NBA commissioner Adam Silver is under fire for his governance. This time, it was due to a controversial rule that was implemented in hopes of achieving a specific result. However, it seems like Silver is once again facing criticism, this time from none other than Charles Barkley and the TNT crew.
The rule in question was put in place to prevent players from intentionally fouling poor free-throw shooters, also known as the “Hack-a-Shaq” strategy. The recent controversy broke out during the game between the New York Knicks and the Detroit Pistons, where Pistons’ center Mason Plumlee was intentionally fouled by the Knicks in the final minutes of the game. This was done in an attempt to stop the Pistons from scoring and potentially seal a win for the Knicks.
The rule, which was introduced back in 2016, states that teams will be awarded possession of the ball after an intentional foul on a player who is not in possession of the ball in the last two minutes of the game. This means that the team on the receiving end of the foul will not shoot free throws but instead retain possession of the ball. The intention behind this rule was to eliminate the “Hack-a-Shaq” strategy, which many considered to be boring and slow down the pace of the game.
However, the new rule has once again drawn criticism, with Barkley and the TNT crew calling it “meaningless.” Barkley, who has been vocal about his issues with Silver in the past, was quick to point out the flaws in the rule. He argued that the teams who use the “Hack-a-Shaq” strategy are usually trailing in the game and are trying to make a comeback. Thus, giving them possession of the ball does not punish them in any way.
The TNT crew also questioned the timing of the intentional foul being called in the Knicks-Pistons game, as it was done with only 1.2 seconds remaining in the game. The crew argued that this essentially nullified any chance of the Pistons scoring and winning the game. They also pointed out that this rule only applies in the last two minutes of the game, and thus, teams can still use the “Hack-a-Shaq” strategy in the remaining time.
This is not the first time that Silver has faced criticism for his decisions and policies as the NBA commissioner. In the past, he has been questioned for his handling of sensitive issues such as players’ mental health and social justice. However, Silver has also been praised for his progressive approach towards player safety and the NBA’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
But it is not just Barkley and the TNT crew who are unhappy with the ruling. Players and coaches have also expressed their concerns, with many arguing that it takes away the integrity of the game and affects the outcome of the match. Some even suggest that the rule should be completely eliminated to allow for fair play and a more exciting finish to close games.
In light of the recent controversy, Silver will likely face pressure to review and possibly make changes to the rule. However, it is worth noting that no rule is perfect, and there will always be differing opinions and criticisms. Despite this, Silver has shown a willingness to listen to players and take necessary action when needed, and it is what makes him a commendable commissioner.
In conclusion, while the new rule may have been well-intentioned, it has once again put Adam Silver in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. However, it is necessary to understand that running a league as massive as the NBA is not an easy task, and difficult decisions will always need to be made. As such, it is important to trust and support Silver in his decisions, rather than constantly criticize and question his every move. Only then can the NBA continue to thrive and provide incredible entertainment for fans all over the world.
